Before the Mall: La Grange Road in 1965

In 1965, Route 45 โ€” the state highway that runs north-south through the heart of what is now Orland Park's commercial district, and which locals know simply as La Grange Road โ€” was a two-lane farm road. There were no traffic signals south of 143rd Street. There were no strip malls. There were no franchise restaurants. There were, on either side of the pavement, cornfields that stretched to the horizon, interrupted only by the occasional farm lane leading back to a white clapboard house and a machine shed.

The commercial activity that did exist along the corridor was minimal and agricultural in character. A grain elevator stood near the 143rd Street crossing โ€” the facility that received the harvest from the surrounding farms and loaded it onto railroad cars. A few gas stations marked the major intersections, selling fuel to the tractors and the occasional automobile. A farm supply store near the Orland Park station served the equipment and seed needs of the township's farming operations. That was essentially all.

Orland Park's downtown โ€” such as it was โ€” existed along a short stretch of 151st Street, the perpendicular artery that crossed La Grange Road at what had been the nucleus of the original 1892 incorporation. Here, within a few blocks, were the establishments that served the village's modest residential population: a hardware store where you could get a screen door repaired and pick up a bag of nails; a barbershop with a genuine red-and-white pole; a diner that served breakfast and lunch; a pharmacy with a soda fountain. Most of the village's 13,000 residents in the early 1960s did their serious shopping in Oak Lawn, the much larger and more commercially developed community a dozen miles to the north, or made the longer trip to the Chicago neighborhoods along 63rd Street or Ashland Avenue.

The Illinois Department of Transportation had plans for Route 45 โ€” the state recognized it as a significant regional arterial, and widening studies were already underway โ€” but the actual construction of the wider road that would make large-scale retail development viable was still years away. The land on either side of the highway remained in agricultural ownership: large parcels held by the same farm families โ€” German, Bohemian, Scandinavian immigrant descendants โ€” who had worked the soil for generations.

Interstate 57, the expressway that would become the second engine of Orland Park's commercial development, did not yet reach its full extension into the southwest suburban corridor. When the I-57 interchange at 159th Street was completed and access to the broader expressway network was established, it would transform La Grange Road's commercial potential overnight. But in 1965, that future was still invisible. The road was a farm road. The land was farmland. And the people who would reshape both were still making their plans.

Source: Illinois Department of Transportation road records; Cook County Assessor historical records; Orland Township farm survey records, 1960s
§

The Orland Square Decision, 1972โ€“1976

The decision that would transform La Grange Road โ€” and with it, Orland Park โ€” was made not by elected officials or highway engineers but by a developer named Urban Land Corporation, which identified the intersection of La Grange Road and 151st Street as the optimal site for a regional shopping center serving the rapidly growing southwestern suburbs of Chicago. The site selection logic was commercially airtight: two state highways crossed there. Interstate 57 was close enough to draw traffic from a broad regional catchment. The land was flat and easily assembled. And perhaps most importantly, the village of Orland Park had a political leadership โ€” the Doogan machine โ€” that understood the value of the mall and was willing to facilitate the land assembly and infrastructure connections necessary to make it happen.

The farmland at the 151st-and-La Grange corner was annexed into the village through the processes that the Doogan machine had perfected over the preceding decade. Multiple agricultural parcels were consolidated into the footprint that Urban Land Corporation required. The village committed to extending water and sewer infrastructure to the site. Zoning was amended to accommodate the commercial use. The deals were made in the way that deals were made in Orland Park in the early 1970s โ€” largely in private, with the formal public record reflecting only the final decisions, not the negotiations that had produced them.

Construction of Orland Square Mall began in 1974. The project was massive by the standards of the southwestern suburbs: a fully enclosed regional shopping center covering more than a million square feet, anchored by four major department stores and served by thousands of parking spaces on what had, eighteen months earlier, been cornfield. The structural steel rose over the former farmland through 1974 and 1975. When Orland Square opened in 1976, it was anchored by Wieboldt's, Carson Pirie Scott, Sears, and JCPenney โ€” the full complement of Chicago-region department store retail, the complete package that defined what a regional mall was supposed to be.

The first sales tax check Orland Square generated for the village was larger than the entire municipal budget had been five years earlier.

โ€” Paraphrase of village finance records and contemporaneous reporting, 1976โ€“1977

The impact on the village's finances was transformative and nearly immediate. Sales tax revenue from Orland Square and the commercial development it instantly catalyzed became the dominant income stream of Orland Park's municipal budget. The village had, in a stroke, converted itself from a modestly resourced agricultural municipality into a commercially vibrant suburb capable of funding professional municipal services at a scale that its residential property tax base alone could never have supported.

The "tax base magnet" effect was equally powerful. Once Orland Square existed, every strip mall developer, fast food franchisee, car dealer, and service retailer in the Chicago metropolitan area wanted a location on La Grange Road. You positioned your business near the regional mall because that was where the traffic was. The mall created traffic; traffic justified retail; retail created more traffic. The commercial corridor that would eventually stretch from 143rd Street south to 179th Street โ€” more than four miles of near-continuous retail development โ€” was seeded by that 1976 opening.

Source: Cook County Recorder of Deeds (commercial plats, 1972โ€“1976); Orland Park municipal budget records; Southtown Star retail reporting, 1976โ€“1978
§

The Strip Mall Explosion, 1976โ€“1985

Within three years of Orland Square's opening, the commercial transformation of La Grange Road had become visible from a great distance. The cornfields were gone. In their place, a two-mile stretch of the highway was lined with strip development: single-story commercial buildings set back behind enormous parking lots, accessed by curb cuts every hundred feet, connected by nothing more than asphalt and the logic of the automobile. It was, in the spatial vocabulary of American suburbia, a perfectly standard commercial corridor. In the context of what La Grange Road had been a decade earlier, it was an almost incomprehensible transformation.

The franchise invasion of Orland Park proceeded with the mechanical efficiency of a national rollout strategy. McDonald's arrived. Burger King arrived. The major grocery chains staked their claims: Jewel-Osco built multiple locations, and Dominick's attempted to establish competitive positions in the village's expanding residential neighborhoods. Target opened one of its earlier Cook County suburban locations on the corridor. The chain drugstores โ€” Walgreen's, Osco โ€” established themselves at the major intersections. The logic was straightforward: Orland Park was growing fast, the demographics were favorable (rising household incomes, young families), and the traffic from the mall guaranteed that any national franchise positioned on La Grange Road would meet its minimum required sales threshold.

Auto Row

One of the most distinctive features that emerged along La Grange Road in the late 1970s and early 1980s was the concentration of automobile dealerships. The corridor between roughly 143rd Street and 159th Street became what locals simply called "Auto Row" โ€” a gauntlet of Ford, Chevrolet, Chrysler, and imported car dealerships, each occupying several acres of frontage along the highway, their inventory gleaming under banks of fluorescent lights visible a quarter-mile away on winter nights.

The car dealership concentration was not accidental. Automotive sales generated among the highest per-acre sales tax yields of any retail use. A single busy dealership could generate more municipal sales tax revenue than a dozen fast food restaurants. The village's political leadership โ€” in the post-Doogan reform era and before it โ€” understood this and worked to attract and retain dealership tenants through favorable zoning, infrastructure support, and the general posture of a municipality that wanted to be known as business-friendly.

By the mid-1980s, the Auto Row concentration had grown to include multiple domestic and import brands. Toyota, Honda, and the emerging Japanese brand dealerships found positions on the corridor alongside the traditional domestic dealers. The automotive cluster would remain a defining feature of La Grange Road's commercial character for decades, though it would eventually thin out as industry consolidation and the internet transformed the car-buying process.

The Home Improvement Corridor

The third major commercial cluster that crystallized along La Grange Road in this era was building materials and home improvement. Orland Park Lumber had served the area's construction needs for years, but as the residential boom of the 1970s and 1980s produced tens of thousands of new homeowners, the demand for home improvement retail reached a scale that attracted the national category leaders. Home Depot established one of its early suburban Chicago locations on or near the La Grange Road corridor, bringing with it the "big box" retail model that would reshape commercial development everywhere: enormous single-story structures with suburban acreage footprints, competing on price and selection rather than service or location.

Gas stations occupied every significant intersection. By 1985, essentially every major national fast food chain had established a presence in Orland Park. The drive-through window โ€” a technology that assumed universal automobile ownership and no pedestrian traffic whatsoever โ€” was the dominant commercial interface. The streetscape of La Grange Road by the mid-1980s was entirely automobile-oriented, a landscape designed to be experienced at thirty-five miles per hour from behind a windshield, with no accommodation for the pedestrian, the cyclist, or any other non-motorized mode of movement.

Source: Cook County Recorder of Deeds commercial records; Orland Park municipal permit records; Illinois Department of Revenue sales tax data; Southtown Star business section, 1976โ€“1985
§

The Department Store Wars, 1985โ€“2000

The 1980s brought the great era of department store competition to Orland Square and the broader La Grange Road corridor. The mall that had opened in 1976 with four anchors was already expanding โ€” a Bloomingdale's wing was added in 1981, significantly upgrading the mall's status from a straightforward working-class and middle-class destination to a venue capable of attracting higher-income shoppers from a broader geographic radius. Lord and Taylor eventually joined as well, completing a lineup that positioned Orland Square as genuinely competitive with the established north suburban malls that had previously dominated the Chicago region's upscale retail market.

This expansion brought Orland Square into direct competition with Lincoln Mall in Matteson and Evergreen Plaza in Evergreen Park. Each of these regional malls had its own captive geography and established customer relationships. The competition was genuine and occasionally cutthroat: developers and anchor tenants played neighboring communities against each other, extracting tax subsidies, infrastructure commitments, and favorable annexation terms from municipalities desperate to keep or attract major retail anchors. Orland Park was no exception. The village's entire fiscal model was premised on maintaining Orland Square's vitality, which meant the village was structurally unable to take a hard line with developers who demanded public concessions.

The Jewel Monopoly

One of the more revealing episodes in the corridor's commercial history was what observers at the time called the Jewel monopoly. Jewel Food Stores โ€” the dominant Chicago-area grocery chain โ€” pursued a site-acquisition strategy in Orland Park that was explicitly designed to prevent meaningful competition. By building multiple locations around the village's perimeter, Jewel effectively established a ring of stores that controlled the most commercially viable grocery sites. Dominick's, the principal competitor, found itself unable to secure prime sites because the favorable locations had already been locked up by Jewel through long-term leases or ownership.

The result, for years, was a grocery landscape in Orland Park that was less competitive than market conditions warranted. Residents paid somewhat more for groceries than they might have if Dominick's had been able to establish equivalent positioning. The episode illustrated a recurring pattern in the corridor's development: in a suburban commercial landscape built around automobile access and large-format retail, the ability to secure prime real estate at the right intersections was often more valuable than the quality of the goods or services being sold.

Specialty Retail and the Category Killers

The 1990s brought the second wave of retail transformation to La Grange Road: the "category killer" specialty chains that promised the deepest selection and lowest prices in their specific product categories. Bed Bath and Beyond arrived with its vast housewares inventory. Best Buy established its electronics format. Sports Authority occupied enormous square footage with sporting goods. Circuit City competed with Best Buy for the consumer electronics customer. Borders and other book superstores added their inventory to the commercial mix.

Each of these chains followed the same development template: a single-story building of thirty to seventy thousand square feet, set far back from the street behind a surface parking lot, accessed by a curb cut from the main arterial. Pedestrian infrastructure was irrelevant to the format. Public transit access was irrelevant to the format. The format assumed an automobile, a trunk, and a willingness to drive twenty minutes for slightly lower prices on a flat-screen television or a set of bath towels.

The irony was that these same chains โ€” Borders, Circuit City, Sports Authority, Bed Bath and Beyond โ€” would all eventually fail, leaving behind enormous vacant boxes on the La Grange Road corridor that the village would struggle for years to repurpose. The "category killer" model that had seemed invincible in 1995 was itself killed by a category: e-commerce.

Source: Cook County Assessor commercial property records; Illinois Department of Revenue sales tax summaries; Southtown Star retail reporting, 1985โ€“2000; Chicago Tribune business section
§

Sales Tax Dependence: The Trap Was Set

By 1990, the structural reality of Orland Park's fiscal situation had become undeniable, though it was rarely stated plainly in public. Sales tax revenue from the La Grange Road corridor represented approximately 30 to 40 percent of the village's municipal budget โ€” a level of dependence on retail commerce that made the village functionally incapable of making planning decisions that might threaten that revenue stream.

This was not a secret. Village officials understood it, and they acted accordingly. Any developer with a commercially significant project proposal had extraordinary leverage over the village, because the village could not afford to see that project go to Tinley Park or Mokena instead. The implicit negotiation was always the same: the developer needed something โ€” a TIF district, a zoning variance, a infrastructure commitment, a favorable annexation boundary โ€” and the village needed the sales tax revenue. The outcomes were predictable.

The village had built itself on sales tax. Now the sales tax was making decisions for the village.

โ€” Observation from Orland Park budget analysis, circa 1992

The political consequences of sales tax dependence extended beyond individual development negotiations. It shaped the entire culture of governance. A village that needed retail sales tax could not aggressively enforce building codes in ways that annoyed major commercial tenants. It could not prioritize pedestrian infrastructure or transit connectivity at the expense of parking and traffic flow, because the retail model required maximum automobile accessibility. It could not take positions on regional planning issues โ€” road widening, expressway extensions, freight rail โ€” that conflicted with the interests of large commercial property owners, because those property owners were the source of the revenue on which the village's service capacity depended.

The TIF Weapon

Tax Increment Financing districts became the primary tool through which the village subsidized retail development in the 1990s and 2000s. The TIF mechanism โ€” legally complex but operationally straightforward โ€” allowed the village to capture future property tax increment generated by a new development and redirect it to subsidize the development's costs, effectively using public money to reduce the developer's risk. TIF districts were, in Illinois, almost impossible to scrutinize or challenge through normal democratic processes: they were approved in public meetings, but the financial projections and deal terms were invariably prepared by consultants hired by the developer and presented to the village as fait accompli.

The $33 million TIF controversy surrounding the Orland Park Crossing redevelopment โ€” the former Sears and JCPenney anchor redevelopment project at Orland Square โ€” was the most visible and politically contentious of these subsidies. Critics argued that the village was spending tens of millions in public money to bail out a private mall owner who had benefited for decades from the same public infrastructure that all Orland Park residents paid for. Supporters argued that allowing the anchor spaces to remain vacant would devastate the mall's viability and threaten the sales tax revenue on which the village's budget depended. Both arguments were essentially correct. That was the trap.

Source: Orland Park municipal budget documents; Illinois TIF district filings; Cook County Clerk TIF records; Southtown Star, Chicago Tribune coverage of Orland Square redevelopment
§

The Amazon Effect, 2010 Onward

The hollowing of Orland Square and the broader La Grange Road corridor that accelerated through the 2010s was not a local failure. It was a national phenomenon hitting a local address. E-commerce โ€” and specifically the Amazon Prime model of free two-day shipping on virtually any consumer product, combined with a search interface that made price comparison effortless โ€” dismantled the basic premise of the suburban shopping mall format in under a decade.

The department store anchors fell first. JCPenney closed its Orland Square location, leaving one of the mall's four original anchor boxes dark. Sears, the Chicago-born retailer that had anchored suburban malls across America for half a century, closed its Orland Square store as part of the national bankruptcy that ended the company's existence as a meaningful retail force. The loss of two of the four original anchors left Orland Square in a structural crisis: anchors were not merely large tenants, they were the traffic generators that justified the existence of the smaller specialty stores between them. Without anchor traffic, the specialty tenants' sales declined. As sales declined, tenants left. As tenants left, the mall looked less viable. The spiral was well-documented nationally, and Orland Square was not immune.

The category killer chains that had seemed to represent the next wave of retail โ€” the stores that had displaced the old downtown shops in the 1990s โ€” found themselves displaced in turn. Circuit City failed in 2008. Sports Authority collapsed in 2016. Borders had already closed. Bed Bath and Beyond, which had for years seemed indestructible, began a drawn-out decline that would end in bankruptcy. The big boxes they left behind on La Grange Road were expensive to retrofit for alternative uses โ€” the high ceilings, the loading dock configurations, the enormous parking lots โ€” and they sat vacant for years at a time.

The Redevelopment Challenge

The village's response to the retail hollowing was the Orland Park Crossing mixed-use redevelopment โ€” an attempt to convert the former anchor spaces at Orland Square into a combination of residential units, restaurants, fitness facilities, and entertainment uses that could attract foot traffic on a model not dependent on traditional retail shopping. The $33 million TIF subsidy was the price tag of this transition.

Whether the transition will succeed is, as of 2026, still an open question. The conversion of aging mall anchor space to residential use is a genuinely difficult planning problem: the buildings were designed for retail traffic flow, not human habitation; the parking infrastructure is oversized for residential density; the surrounding streetscape remains entirely automobile-oriented. You cannot easily make a place walkable or transit-accessible after fifty years of car-dependent development have shaped every aspect of its physical form. The legacy of the decisions made in the 1970s โ€” when La Grange Road was designed as a high-speed commercial arterial to be experienced from a car, never from a sidewalk โ€” constrains every redevelopment option available today.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau retail trade data; Orland Park municipal records; Cook County Assessor commercial property data; Chicago Tribune business reporting, 2010โ€“2025
§

The Arab American Food and Restaurant Economy

Within the broader story of La Grange Road's commercial history โ€” a story dominated by national franchises, regional mall anchors, and the fiscal strategies of municipal government โ€” there exists a parallel and largely uncelebrated economic narrative: the emergence of a substantial Arab American small-business economy that transformed a portion of the Orland Park commercial landscape and created something genuinely distinctive within the homogenized suburban retail environment.

Lebanese and Palestinian immigrant families began arriving in the southwestern suburbs of Chicago in significant numbers during the 1980s, drawn by a combination of factors: affordable housing compared to the city's Arab neighborhoods on the North Side, good schools, proximity to employment centers accessible via I-57 and I-294, and the presence of an existing Arab American community in the adjacent suburbs that provided the social infrastructure โ€” mosques, Arabic-language services, community organizations โ€” necessary to sustain immigrant family life.

As these families established themselves in Orland Park and the adjacent communities, some members of the second generation and entrepreneurially-minded first-generation arrivals began opening businesses. The initial cluster was concentrated in food: bakeries producing the pita bread, baklava, and other Middle Eastern baked goods that were difficult to find in mainstream supermarkets; restaurants serving Lebanese, Palestinian, and Persian cuisine to both the Arab American community and the broader suburban population that was increasingly adventurous in its food choices.

The Arab American commercial corridor in Orland Park developed primarily along La Grange Road south of 151st Street and along the 159th Street cross-corridor โ€” the same arterials that had been the arteries of the mainstream retail boom. Establishments including Al-Noor Bakery, Kasra Persian Grill, and a constellation of other Middle Eastern restaurants, halal butcher shops, import grocery stores, and specialty food retailers created what amounted to a micro-corridor of ethnic commerce within the broader commercial strip.

By 2010, Orland Park and the immediately adjacent communities had developed one of the highest concentrations of Arab American-owned businesses in the southwestern Chicago suburbs. The community's economic footprint extended beyond food into professional services โ€” medical practices, law offices, real estate firms โ€” reflecting the arrival of a substantial professional-class Arab American population alongside the working-class and entrepreneurial families who had arrived earlier.

The Arab American business community occupied a distinctive position in the La Grange Road commercial ecology: its establishments were largely immune to the Amazon effect because food service, fresh-baked goods, halal butcher service, and the social experience of eating in a community restaurant cannot be delivered by a fulfillment center. The immigrant family restaurant proved more durable than the category-killer chain store precisely because it offered something that required physical presence โ€” not just a product, but a place.

The demographic shift that produced the Arab American business community was itself a consequence of the village's annexation-driven growth. Orland Park's expansion had created thousands of housing units at price points accessible to immigrant families in the 1980s and 1990s. The village's geographic position โ€” at the intersection of major regional expressways, served by Metra rail, adjacent to significant employment concentrations โ€” made it attractive to the same immigrant populations that had in earlier generations settled in Chicago's near-southwest neighborhoods before moving outward along the expressway corridors. The Arab American community of Orland Park was, in this sense, a direct product of the same suburban growth machine that had built the mall and the strip malls and the car dealerships.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (Arab ancestry data); Cook County Assessor business property records; Arab American Action Network demographic surveys; Orland Park Chamber of Commerce member records
§

The Numbers: Retail Square Footage by Decade

The physical scale of the La Grange Road corridor's commercial development can be measured in several ways โ€” acres of impervious surface, number of curb cuts, miles of strip mall frontage โ€” but the most intuitive metric is simply retail square footage: how much space was dedicated to commercial use, and how did that change over time as the corridor grew, matured, and began its partial decline?

La Grange Road Corridor โ€” Approximate Retail Square Footage and Major Anchors by Decade
Decade Approx. Retail Sq. Ft. Major New Anchors Character of Growth
Pre-1970 < 50,000 Grain elevator, farm supply, gas stations Agricultural service commercial; no regional retail
1970โ€“1979 ~1.2 million Orland Square Mall (Wieboldt's, Carson's, Sears, JCPenney); early strip retail Regional mall opening triggers immediate corridor development
1980โ€“1989 ~2.8 million Bloomingdale's, Lord & Taylor (mall); Home Depot; auto dealers; major grocery chains Fastest growth decade; auto row; national franchises; category retail
1990โ€“1999 ~4.1 million Best Buy, Circuit City, Sports Authority, Bed Bath & Beyond, Borders; additional strip plazas Category killers; specialty retail boom; ethnic food corridor emerges
2000โ€“2009 ~4.6 million Target expansion; Walmart; additional mixed commercial plazas Peak square footage; first signs of saturation; Circuit City closes 2008
2010โ€“2019 ~3.9 million (net, after closures) Orland Park Crossing (redevelopment); fitness, restaurant, medical tenants Amazon effect: department stores close; big boxes darken; redevelopment TIF
2020โ€“2025 ~3.4 million (estimated) Mixed-use residential/commercial conversions; medical office; food hall concept Post-pandemic: further consolidation; adaptive reuse; ethnic food robust

Major Anchor Timeline

1976
Orland Square Mall opens โ€” anchored by Wieboldt's, Carson Pirie Scott, Sears, JCPenney. The event that transforms La Grange Road from farm road to retail corridor overnight.
1981
Bloomingdale's wing added to Orland Square. The mall upgrades its market positioning from middle-market to upscale, drawing from a broader regional customer base.
c.1983
Home Depot and early big box retail arrive on the corridor. The category killer format โ€” massive square footage, deep inventory, low prices โ€” begins displacing smaller specialty retailers.
c.1987
Lord & Taylor joins Orland Square as a fifth anchor, marking the mall's peak competitive positioning relative to regional alternatives.
c.1993
Best Buy, Sports Authority, Bed Bath & Beyond establish corridor locations. The category killer era reaches full expression on La Grange Road.
2008
Circuit City closes nationally, including its Orland Park location. First major category killer casualty โ€” a signal of the retail format disruption to come.
2011
Borders Books closes. The big-box book superstore โ€” which had itself displaced independent bookstores โ€” is now displaced by Amazon's e-commerce dominance.
c.2014
JCPenney closes at Orland Square. The first anchor departure begins the mall's structural crisis. JCPenney's floor space sits dark for years.
c.2018
Sears closes at Orland Square. The last of the original 1976 anchors departs. The mall has lost two of four anchors. Village commits $33M TIF to fund redevelopment.
2020โ€“25
Orland Park Crossing mixed-use redevelopment โ€” former anchor spaces converted to apartments, restaurants, fitness, and entertainment. The post-retail future takes physical form.
1976
Mall opening year
4
Original mall anchors
~4.6M
Peak retail sq. ft. (c.2005)
30โ€“40%
Of village budget from sales tax (1990)
$33M
TIF subsidy for Orland Crossing
50 yrs
Retail corridor lifespan, 1976โ€“2026
§

What La Grange Road Tells Us

The fifty-year arc of La Grange Road's commercial development is, in microcosm, the story of American retail capitalism's postwar expansion and its early-twenty-first-century reckoning. The farm road became a corridor because a regional mall needed a site and a political machine needed a revenue base. The corridor expanded because the automobile-dependent commercial format that the mall anchored was perfectly suited to the infrastructure that was simultaneously being built โ€” the expressways, the parking lots, the wide arterial roads โ€” and because the demographics of Orland Park's expanding residential population provided exactly the consumer base that national franchises and department stores required.

The corridor is now contracting, or more precisely, it is transforming. The retail square footage that was added between 1976 and 2005 is not being fully replaced; some of it is being repurposed for residential, medical, or food service uses, and some of it sits vacant. The Arab American restaurants that line segments of the corridor have proven more durable than the category killers that preceded them, because food is experience and experience cannot be shipped from a fulfillment center in Joliet. The mixed-use redevelopment at Orland Square is an attempt to reimagine the corridor's role โ€” to make it a place rather than merely a commercial strip.

Whether that reimagining succeeds will depend on decisions that are harder to make than the original annexation decisions were: not the straightforward question of whether to bring a developer's cornfield into the village limits, but the genuinely difficult question of what kind of place a suburb wants to be when the retail model that funded its growth has reached its limits. Orland Park has fifty years of practice at growing. It is now learning, perhaps for the first time, how to mature.

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau (retail trade, population); Illinois Department of Revenue (municipal sales tax data); Cook County Assessor (commercial property records); Orland Park municipal budget records; Cook County Recorder of Deeds (commercial plats and leases); Chicago Tribune; Southtown Star archives (newspapers.com); Arab American Action Network demographic data; Orland Park Chamber of Commerce records